[news] Noise, Nudity, Foul Language: Airbnb Hosts Should Be Fined, Says Report

166news

Active Member
Staff member
Noise, nudity, foul language: Airbnb hosts should be fined, says report
Date: April 14, 2016

Nassim Khadem Deputy Editor BusinessDay

Airbnb hosts renting out their apartments in cities, including Sydney and Melbourne, should be slapped with speeding-ticket type fines if their guests engage in "disruptive" behaviour – such as noise, nudity and foul language – that upsets the neighbours.

1460590727769.jpg

The Grattan Institute suggests body corporates be allowed to issue fines over ''disruptive behaviour''. Photo: Bloomberg

Those are just some of the recommendations from think-tank Grattan Institute, which has unveiled a new report recommending how state and federal governments can regulate new "sharing economy" or "peer-to-peer" services such as Airbnb and Uber.

The report, Peer-to-peer pressure, How the government should make the most of the sharing economy, says there is a need for reform of competition, consumer and tax policy to allow such services to flourish.

It recommends all governments legalise ride sharing, saying recent such moves by the NSW and the ACT "provide good models for other governments to follow".

1460585903751.jpg

The Grattan Institute's Jim Minifie says fines need to be "big enough to make an impact". Photo: Louise Kennerley

Powers to fine Airbnb hosts
In relation to short-term rental accommodation such as Airbnb, it says "any rent increases caused by the rise of short-stay rentals are likely to be localised or small", and governments should "freely permit all occasional short-stay whole-premise letting".

To limit noise and loss of amenity when people rent out their spaces, the report suggests state governments give owners' corporations (also known as body corporates) more powers to control short-stay rentals, "possibly even the power to ban continuous, whole-premise short-stay rentals if agreed to by members".

The report points out that for all the complaints from body corporates that typically deal with physical property issues and other problems when people live close together, disruptive behaviour is relatively low.

Airbnb, which began operating in Australia in 2009, is the biggest global accommodation platform with more than 66,000 listings, mostly in inner Sydney and Melbourne. Stayz has more than 40,000 property listings.

airbnb.jpg


Aggregate data for apartment buildings with short-stay accommodation sites shows that out of a total of 1.2 million stays, just over 1000 complaints were made. These included problems of users of short-term accommodation damaging property, littering in common areas, loud noise and music, and offensive language.

It also included behaviour such as drinking alcohol and/or smoking in common areas, vomiting, urinating or defecating in common areas, visible nudity, dropping items from balconies, and overcrowding. There were also a few occasions where building security, police or other emergency services been called to attend to complaints.

Grattan Institute productivity growth program director Jim Minifie, a co-author of the report, said body corporates could be given powers under existing laws to hit owners renting out homes with fines if there were such disruption. "You would want the fine to be big enough to make an impact," he said. "Per incident it could be a speeding-ticket-fine amount."

14AirBnBMelbourneData.jpg
 

Matt F

Well-Known Member
There is a airbnb on my floor.
Luckily I'm not right next door to it, as I gather it can be noisy on weekends.

(Wouldn't mind the nudity though! ;) - many of the airbnb travellers are groups of girls from Europe and Asia)
 

166news

Active Member
Staff member
Victoria targets Airbnb landlords and visiting party animals
No more carry on: Victoria is to bring in new rules to tackle short-stay party houses
1426320916439.png
by Nick Lenaghan

Victoria is cracking down on landlords who have allowed their apartments to be turned into party houses by short-stay guests using services such as Airbnb.

Under the tough new laws, the state's planning tribunal can ban landlords from letting their apartments for short stays if they are repeatedly used for wild parties or activities that disrupt others.

The Victorian move comes as states and local councils around the country grapple with the challenge of balancing the benefits of the fast-growing short-stay accommodation market against its potential to disrupt neighbours.

In NSW a parliamentary inquiry is looking at into the adequacy of regulation around the burgeoning short-stay market.

The new Victorian laws will make apartment owners and landlords, who use services such as Airbnb, liable for damage or loss of amenity caused by their guests.

"This is a big shift, This is allowing people who have previously felt powerless, where there's been party apartments in their apartment blocks," said the state's consumer affairs minister Jane Garrett. "It gives them the capacity to pursue the owner of that apartment.

"From running up and down the halls, damaging common property, party house music all night, urinating in the stairwells, making people's lives hell: this is what we're stamping out.

"You don't have to actually trash the walls to trash someone's night.

"You can have the music pumping, you can have screaming up and down the halls, you can have carry-on on the balconies. That can mean a quiet Sunday dinner with your family visiting you from somewhere else is completely ruined."

Airbnb's country manager Sam McDonagh was quick to embrace the changes as "good news" for Victorians, whom, he said, were among the best hosts globally on the short-stay platform.

"Whilst we are aware these incidences do take place, they are very much in the minority," he said. "There is no room on Airbnb for the kind of behaviour we are trying to stamp out."

But not everyone was happy. The 'We Live Here' lobby group for owners and residents in high-rise apartments described the incoming rules as "catch me if you can" legislation, because owners' corporations could only take action after unruly behaviour had occurred.

As well, the new laws will curtail existing common law rights by capping the penalties that are meted out by the planning tribunal at $2000, it said.

"Residents in high-rise buildings are no better off under these changes," said the lobby group's Marshall Delves.

Read more: http://www.afr.com/real-estate/resi...g-party-animals-20160523-gp1i6m#ixzz49TZmjPoM
 

Matt F

Well-Known Member
Loud apartment sex driving neighbours bonkers
f1e402b32e1d4ca62cdaf6ae26b13df4

Kara Irving, Herald Sun
August 5, 2016 1:52pm

f1e402b32e1d4ca62cdaf6ae26b13df4

FEISTY tenants in a city apartment are driving their neighbours bonkers by having loud, early morning sex.

The Melbourne owner of the Darling Point, Sydney unit has even been threatened with a fine, if the boisterous bonking continues.

Julie, who did not want her surname published, recently received a complaint from the owners corporation about ‘disturbing noises’ coming from her apartment in April.

“In particular, talking loudly on the phone at 1am and loud coitus,” the letter read.

Julie bought the harbourside property to list on Air Bnb 18 months ago and was shocked when she opened the letter.

“Someone must have been jealous,” she told 3AW’s Rumour File.

“I was shocked but I laughed. I thought small minded people might be complaining.”

Julie has never spoken to the raunchy couple about the encounter.

7911f306f56186bbd76be64fa7a4583d

The letter.

“I’ve been away for a couple of months and don’t even remember who was in there,” she said.

“There was a couple staying there at the time. But I wasn’t going to call them up and ask what they were doing.”

That's the problem with all these new developments. Poorly constructed, no sound deadening or acoustic layering. Blame the architects and builders

The letter said Julie needs to comply with noise levels in Strata Schemes Management Act, including: “An owner or occupier of a lot must not create any noise on the parcel likely to interfere with the peaceful enjoyment of the owner or occupier of another lot or of any person lawfully using common property.”

The owners corporation could fine Julie if her tenants do not comply.


Comments
John Citizen 42 minutes ago
She bought the harbourside property to list on Air Bnb 18 months ago. And that's why I won't buy a city apartment because they can end up being defacto hotels.

Rob1 hour ago
That's the problem with all these new developments. Poorly constructed, no sound deadening or acoustic layering. Blame the architects and builders

Peter 1 hour ago
I'll trade my neighbours two constantly barking dogs for a bit of bonking noise any day of the week.

Jackie2 hours
It just goes to show the shoddy cheap development she has bought into. Paper thin adjoining walls is the issue.
 
Top